A configuration of On-Kare Pro sized for one practitioner: documentation, scheduling and billing under one login.

Solo practitioners across any discipline who own and run their practice without a group behind them.

Which problem does it solve?

Setup, support and continuity all depend on one person, and most software assumes someone else handles that.

Defaults are chosen for solo use, the subscription is a single line, and cover access is granted without rebuilding an account.

Continuity is treated as a feature, a covering colleague, not just the owner, can keep the practice running.

The independent-practice path of the product tour shows setup, a consultation and a cover-mode handover.

Independent practitioners running their own practice without a group or network administration behind them

On-Kare for independent practice

There is no back office here: the person who sees the patient is also the one who configures the software, checks the invoice and answers the phone.

01
Every setup decision, integration and support request lands on the practitioner, because there is no admin team to absorb it.
02
Tools built for a group's purchasing process assume a decision-maker who is not the same person as the end user.
03
When the practitioner is away, the practice has no one else who can open the diary, answer a message or issue an invoice.

the practice is configured by the practitioner in one sitting, with defaults suited to solo use.

documentation, scheduling and billing are a single line item, not three vendors to reconcile.

a locum or covering colleague gets a scoped, time-limited access without a new account being built from scratch.

Referenced, never restated: each capability is described on its own page.

Which surface carries each business domain in this context: Pro for the team, Me for the patient, One for the shared layer underneath.

Read what it covers and how it is delivered.

Read what it covers and how it is delivered.

Read what it covers and how it is delivered.

01
Contracts and pricing are sized for one practitioner's decision, not a procurement cycle with a buying committee.
02
Invoicing rules for a sole trader or liberal profession differ from those of a company, and vary by country.
03
Data export and closure terms matter more here: there is no IT department to negotiate them if the practitioner ever leaves.

No customer story is published for independent practice yet; the tour shows solo setup and cover mode on real screens.

The surface this workflow runs on.

What is it?: A configuration of On-Kare Pro sized for one practitioner: documentation, scheduling and billing under one login.
Who is it for?: Solo practitioners across any discipline who own and run their practice without a group behind them.
Which problem does it solve?: Setup, support and continuity all depend on one person, and most software assumes someone else handles that.
How does it work?: Defaults are chosen for solo use, the subscription is a single line, and cover access is granted without rebuilding an account.
How is it different?: Continuity is treated as a feature — a covering colleague, not just the owner, can keep the practice running.
What is the proof?: The independent-practice path of the product tour shows setup, a consultation and a cover-mode handover.

This page is part of a platform of 2,156 clinical and operational capabilities across 8 business domains.

ISO 27001-ready · certification plannedSOC 2: attestation plannedGDPR · DPOHIPAA-ready architecture30+ jurisdictionsSee certification status

There is no back office here: the person who sees the patient is also the one who configures the software, checks the invoice and answers the phone.

Medical review: 2026-08-24 · Legal review: 2026-08-24