An occupational health configuration separating the worker's record from the employer's conclusion.

Occupational health services, employer health providers and inter-company services.

Which problem does it solve?

One encounter owes two different answers to two parties with unequal rights.

The data contract is declared per counterparty and enforced by the record, not by discipline.

Employer visibility is a modelled boundary with an audit trail, not a reporting habit.

The occupational health path of the tour shows both outputs side by side.

Occupational health services and employer health providers

On-Kare for occupational health

Two parties expect an answer from the same appointment, and only one of them may see the clinical record.

01
Employer reporting and clinical documentation are produced from the same encounter with different rights.
02
Campaigns are scheduled per site and per role, which no clinical diary is designed to express.
03
Fitness conclusions must be reproducible and defensible months later, including their basis.

a clinical record for the worker, a conclusion only for the employer.

cohorts by site, role and exposure, with reminders and completion tracking.

each fitness decision records its criteria, its inputs and its author.

Referenced, never restated: each capability is described on its own page.

Which surface carries each business domain in this context: Pro for the team, Me for the patient, One for the shared layer underneath.

Read what it covers and how it is delivered.

Read what it covers and how it is delivered.

Read what it covers and how it is delivered.

01
The employer is a counterparty, not a care team: their access is an explicit, minimal data contract.
02
Exposure history has retention periods measured in decades in several jurisdictions.
03
Mandatory examinations follow statutory frequencies that vary by role and by country.

No occupational health story is published; the tour shows the dual-output encounter on real screens.

The surface this workflow runs on.

What is it?: An occupational health configuration separating the worker's record from the employer's conclusion.
Who is it for?: Occupational health services, employer health providers and inter-company services.
Which problem does it solve?: One encounter owes two different answers to two parties with unequal rights.
How does it work?: The data contract is declared per counterparty and enforced by the record, not by discipline.
How is it different?: Employer visibility is a modelled boundary with an audit trail, not a reporting habit.
What is the proof?: The occupational health path of the tour shows both outputs side by side.

This page is part of a platform of 2,156 clinical and operational capabilities across 8 business domains.

ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IIGDPR · DPOHIPAA-ready, BAA available30+ jurisdictionsSee the dated detail

Two parties expect an answer from the same appointment, and only one of them may see the clinical record.

Medical review: 2026-08-24 · Legal review: 2026-08-24